Sunday, March 22, 2015

1 Timothy/ Should women get a head position in a church? Controversy...

In last week’s class, we (tried to) discuss if a church should even be structured, how it needs to be structured, and, most controversial, if a woman should have a high position in the church.
I think a church should be structured with the more traditional route, you know, with the pastor, the elders and such. Otherwise, we might end up in an organization like the Quakers. Sitting in one place for hours on end, waiting for someone to preach and finally dismiss us? No thanks! But that answer doesn’t deal with things like Bible studies, small groups, and even “house church.”
I guess that house church could and would count as an actual church because there is someone in charge and there is a message being brought to the people. However, a Bible study should remain a Bible study, and it should not be considered “church”.  What should count as a church is an organization with strong leaders, strong members, and a healthy reputation.
And I honestly don’t see a problem with women being at the head of the church. If you read just this verse, it just sounds plain and simple:
12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet.”
        (1 Timothy 2:12)
But here’s the full passage:
“8 I desire then that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands without anger or quarreling; likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire, 10 but with what is proper for women who profess godliness—with good works. 11 Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. 12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve; 14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. 15 Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control.”
He is telling them to “learn quietly with all submissiveness”, meaning he is merely wishing them to learn beside the men. And if you think the other passages are still directed towards all women, in this letter Paul is writing to the church in Ephesus. The women in Ephesus were used to being dominant over the men, so the “gold and pearls” were disrupting the services and making them seem higher than everyone else. Paul is putting this notion to rest and getting the equilibrium back in order.
That’s all I have for this blog. Type down your comments before Freddy gets ya! Do it. Do it. Do it.


Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Ephesians/Revised Blog

Author's note: The blog was for some reason botched in the previous week. That is why this was written.

Welcome back to The Nooby Genius, voted blog of the year, in the year 20XX. 
So, in Ephesians we Paul writing to, well the Ephesians. In the first chapter of Ephesians, Paul says:
 4 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love, 5 having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, 6 to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He made us accepted in the Beloved. (Ephesians 1:4-6)
“What makes this verse so special?” you might ask. Well, for the sake of all of you readers, this verse has the words: “Chosen”, “Predestined”, and “His Will”. Why do these verses matter and why do they make these rather insignificant verses the subject of this blog? Because they have split the church in two different directions: Calvinism and Arminianism, with Calvinism supporting Predestination and God choosing us, and Arminianism supporting free will. I personally believe that we choose God, but that He determines our course, so I’m a mix of both (kind of confusing). However, for the sake of this blog, I will be supporting Arminianism.
Greg Boyd makes the following case against Calvinism:
1.  One must believe to be saved. Whoever believes is saved.
2.  Human beings are moral agents, and are responsible for their sins. God does not program what our decisions are.
3.  God doesn't always get what he wants from humanity. Because of our moral agency, things happen that God does not prefer. Hell is a testimony of this fact.
4.  God is love. God loves every person. God’s loving nature is incompatible with Calvinistic election.

He also makes a good point on how predestination is a corporate and not an individual thing, with “us” meaning Jews, and “you” in other verses meaning the Gentiles.  Therefore, he chooses all of us, but only some answer the call.

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Ephesians/ Why Calvinism gets it wrong.

Welcome back to The Nooby Genius, voted blog of the year, in the year 20XX.  
So, in Ephesians we Paul writing to, well the Ephesians. In the first chapter of Ephesians, Paul says:
 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love, having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He made us accepted in the Beloved. (Ephesians 1:4-6)
“What makes this verse so special?” you might ask. Well, for the sake of all of you readers, this verse has the words: “Chosen”, “Predestined”, and “His Will”. Why do these verses matter and why do they make these rather insignificant verses the subject of this blog? Because they have split the church in two different directions: Calvinism and Arminianism, with Calvinism supporting Predestination and God choosing us, and Arminianism supporting free will. I personally believe that we choose God, but that He determines our course, so I’m a mix of both (kind of confusing). However, for the sake of this blog, I will be supporting Arminianism.
Greg Boyd makes the following case against Calvinism:
1.  One must believe to be saved. Whoever believes is saved.
2.  Human beings are moral agents, and are responsible for their sins. God does not program what our decisions are.
3.  God doesn't
 always get what he wants from humanity. Because of our moral agency, things happen that God does not prefer. Hell is a testimony of this fact.
4.  God is love. God loves every person. God’s loving nature is incompatible with Calvinistic election.
He also makes a good point on how predestination is a corporate and not an individual thing, with “us” meaning Jews, and “you” in other verses meaning the Gentiles.  Therefore, he chooses all of us, but only some answer the call.


That’s all for this blog. You know the drill, but in case you don’t, please suggest this blog to your friends, and tell others that this blog exists.

Bible Cass of epicness

  • why your opinion is important. - To be perfectly honest, most people in my age group don't think it matters to have an interpretation on revelation. However they are wrong, no matter how o...
    9 years ago
  • Revelation: What Even? - This past week in class we talked about some really confusing things. And I mean REALLY confusing… If I’m being totally honest, I’m just going to go ahead...
    9 years ago
  • The Fault In Our Version of Love - Love. The definition for love is: an intense feeling of deep affection. But love is much more than that, especially after reading John. John talks a lot...
    9 years ago
  • Love - Love has always been a confusing topic and all the time used in the wrong way. Most of the time people just say that they love Starbucks or “I love food” ...
    9 years ago
  • A lovely farm - With the passages of the chapters of John, he states that love is one of the most important things that God had thought of. Not only with the obvious,...
    9 years ago
  • Revelation - You should fear and respect Revelation. In my opinion you should have futurist view on it. It is all to come. We do not know when or how but we know it i...
    9 years ago
  • The Essentials? - Is Rob Bell a heretic (someone who accepts a doctrine or teaching that is outside of of the core essentials of a religion)? If we are going to answer th...
    9 years ago
  • -
  • How I Interpret Revelation - Futurism I believe that most of the events written in Revelation is going to happen in the future. This view is called futurism. Futurists divide Revelation...
    9 years ago
  • I Ain't Got No Worries - Revelation. It’s a book that Christians disagree on how it should be interpreted, for example you have Dispensational Premillennialism, Historic Premillen...
    9 years ago